Inhibition of angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs Show more
Inhibition of angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic effects of ANGPTL3 inhibitors. Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing ANGPTL3 inhibitors against placebo. Outcomes included triglycerides (TG), LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), remnant cholesterol (RC), ANGPTL3 and C-reactive protein (CRP). Pooled estimates of percentage change from baseline were obtained using fixed- and random-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mechanism of action: monoclonal antibodies (mAbs, evinacumab), antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs, vupanorsen), and small interfering RNAs (siRNA, zodasiran and solbinsiran). Nine RCTs (1,254 participants) were included. ANGPTL3 inhibition significantly reduced TG (-47.1%), LDL-C (-21.6%), ApoB (-19.9%), non-HDL-C (-31.5%), TC (-32.8%), VLDL-C (-40.6%), and RC (-72.7%). Modest but consistent reductions were also observed in Lp(a) (-11.5%), ApoA1 (-18.3%), and ApoE (-16.4%). ANGPTL3 inhibitors markedly reduced circulating ANGPTL3 protein (-70.7%), with no significant effect on high-sensitivity CRP. Subgroup analyses demonstrated greater reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, non-HDL-C, and TC with evinacumab compared to the other groups, whereas small interfering RNAs produced more pronounced VLDL-C lowering compared with vupanorsen. ANGPTL3 inhibition offers broad lipid-lowering benefits, with particularly marked reductions in TG-rich lipoproteins. Show less
Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In this study we aimed at assessing the effect of currently available lipid-lowering therap Show more
Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In this study we aimed at assessing the effect of currently available lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) on Lp(a) plasma levels. A meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched up to May 2025. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults (≥18 years), phase II, III or IV; (2) English language; (3) comparing the effect of lipid-lowering drugs vs placebo (addition of the same drug to both intervention and control group was acceptable); (4) reporting the effects on Lp(a) levels; (5) intervention duration of more than 3 weeks. The between-group (treatment-placebo) Lp(a) absolute mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each drug class separately. A total of 145,314 subjects from 147 RCTs were included. Statins, bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, omega-3 fatty acids, and fibrates did not affect Lp(a) concentration. Lp(a) levels were significantly reduced by PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAbs, -6.37 mg/dL [-7.26 to -5.47], a 29% reduction from baseline), inclisiran (-4.76 mg/dL [-5.83 to -3.69], a 22% reduction from baseline), CETP inhibitors (CETPi, -6.77 mg/dL [-8.67 to -4.88], a 46% reduction from baseline), and niacin (-7.06 mg/dL [-9.27 to -4.85], a 37% reduction from baseline). In the subgroup analysis by baseline Lp(a) levels, a larger absolute reduction of Lp(a) levels was observed with increasing baseline levels of Lp(a) for PCSK9mAbs, inclisiran, and CETPi. Among available LLTs, PCSK9mAbs, inclisiran, CETPi, and niacin significantly decreased Lp(a) levels. Further research is necessary to understand whether this effect would translate into a clinically relevant cardiovascular benefit. Show less