Facial and Emotional Recognition Systems are technologies that primarily use AI and machine learning to analyze various inputs like facial expression, speech, and physiological signals, to identify an Show more
Facial and Emotional Recognition Systems are technologies that primarily use AI and machine learning to analyze various inputs like facial expression, speech, and physiological signals, to identify and classify human emotions and link them to a variety of epigenomic traits and states. We conducted a Meta-Meta Analysis via Pharmacogenomics (PGx) and Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) across two separate manifestations, including facial physics and emotional expressions. Applying GWAS datasets, 10 GWAS datasets were included, and following multiple filtrations, a GWAS Meta-Meta analysis led to a Secondary Gene List (SGL) of 586 members. Additionally, various indepth silico analyses, such as Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs), refined 300 genes into a unified network, then, by adding 10 GARS genes, 309 genes remained. A different analysis of PPIs uncovered 141 connected genes (Final Gene List: FGL); more precisely, we conducted a PGx-based approach on this FGL. Finally, 1,480 annotations were found, among them, 682 annotations were significant; thus, we considered the genes with at least one significant annotation and found 54 Pharmacogenes in FGL (PGx-FGL). Through this in-depth analysis, we identified strong, significant top phenotypic roles for both DRD2 and BDNF linking genes in 48,780,906 subjects. Our PGx-based GWAS meta-meta-analyses, coupled with genetic and epigenetic liability testing, connected Facial and Emotional Recognition Systems to Spectrum Disorders (Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: ADHD and Autism), Schizophrenia, Depression, and Anxiety. We propose that these findings could have heuristic therapeutic targeting potential and, as such, require intensive further clinical support. Show less
Species from octopi to humans engage in play. This review examines how epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, may regulate play behaviour across taxa. We frame play through historical definit Show more
Species from octopi to humans engage in play. This review examines how epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, may regulate play behaviour across taxa. We frame play through historical definitions, categorizing it into object, locomotor, and social forms, and examine how each may be linked to epigenetic shifts, for example in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression. We then explore the role of domestication in enhancing play via methylation of stress and sociality genes, comparing domesticated chickens, dogs, and foxes to their wild kin. We link the neurobiology of play, spanning the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and reward circuits, to epigenetic modulation. Assessing the evolutionary fitness advantages of play, we compare adaptive benefits against the surplus resource theory. Despite its presence in many taxa, there remains limited direct evidence for a role of epigenetic mechanisms in play, and we urge research into the developmental and adaptive roles of play across a wider range of species. Show less