Social context modulates stress physiology and resilience, yet preclinical rat paradigms vary widely in stressor type, timing of social exposure, contact modality, and endpoint definitions. We synthes Show more
Social context modulates stress physiology and resilience, yet preclinical rat paradigms vary widely in stressor type, timing of social exposure, contact modality, and endpoint definitions. We synthesized rat studies to quantify directional and, where feasible, standardized effect-size evidence for social buffering and to outline translational implications. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched (2008-2025) for in vivo rat studies comparing conspecific (pair/group housing or conspecific presence) versus solitary conditions across validated stress and PTSD-like paradigms (e.g., fear conditioning/extinction, CUS/CMS, social defeat, predator threat). Data extraction and reporting followed PRISMA 2020 and SYRCLE guidance. Synthesis followed a two-tier approach: (i) all eligible contrasts were direction-coded as beneficial, neutral/mixed, or detrimental under conspecific conditions based strictly on reported statistical contrasts; and (ii) for domains with sufficient coded contrasts, the proportion of beneficial comparisons was estimated with exact binomial tests and 95% confidence intervals. Standardized mean-difference meta-analysis (Hedges' g; random-effects REML) was conducted only for predefined outcomes with adequate numerical reporting. Forty studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 89 extracted comparisons. Overall, 69/89 comparisons (≈78%) favored conspecific conditions. Domain-level directional syntheses supported predominance of beneficial outcomes for hormonal (0.72; 95% CI 0.50-1.00; p = 0.048) and neurotrophic/plasticity markers (0.89; 95% CI 0.57-1.00; p = 0.020), whereas inflammatory/oxidative outcomes were more variable (0.71; 95% CI 0.39-0.94; p = 0.227). For predefined behavioral endpoints with sufficient data, effect-size pooling showed a large reduction in conditioned fear (Hedges' g = -1.22 [-1.53; -0.91], p < 0.0001). Social buffering is robust at behavioral and neuroendocrine levels and often aligns with neurotrophic/plasticity markers, while peripheral immune/redox readouts are more context-dependent. Show less
Exercise and heat stress have been reported to independently provide benefits to brain health. We tested the hypothesis that 8 weeks of post-exercise local heating, passive local heating only, or exer Show more
Exercise and heat stress have been reported to independently provide benefits to brain health. We tested the hypothesis that 8 weeks of post-exercise local heating, passive local heating only, or exercise training only improves cognitive performance compared to a control group. Sixty young, healthy participants (n = 30 female, age: 23 [3] years) were randomised into one of four groups: control (CON), aerobic exercise (EX), local heating (HEAT), or combined heat and exercise (HEATEX). Participants completed supervised sessions three times per week for 8 weeks. Exercise sessions were completed at 70-75% of maximum heart rate on a cycle ergometer, and local heating sessions involved hot water immersion (42°C) of the feet (both 45 min duration). The HEATEX group performed both the EX and HEAT components sequentially in the same session (90 min total duration). Cognitive performance was measured at baseline and at the end of the 8-week intervention using the digit symbol substitution task (DSST) and the Stroop test. There was a main effect of time (P < 0.001) where DSST performance improved; however, there was no group effect (P = 0.089) or time by group interaction (P = 0.119). There was no effect of the interventions on Stroop cost (baseline: 90 [SD: 70] ms; post-intervention: 84 [SD: 70] ms; time by condition interaction P = 0.205). Similarly, there were no effects of the interventions on circulating plasma concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (interaction P = 0.189). Eight weeks of exercise training and/or local heating is not sufficient to improve cognitive performance in young, moderately fit individuals. Show less