👤 Giovanni Targher

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) agonists may help treat metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). However, their definitive effects are still unclear. Our study aims to clarify this uncertainty. We utilised conventional Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis to explore potential causal links between plasma GLP-1/GIP concentrations and MASLD and its related traits. Next, we conducted drug-target MR analysis using highly expressed tissue data to assess the effects of corresponding drug perturbation on these traits. Finally, mediation analysis was performed to ascertain whether the potential causal effect is direct or mediated by other MASLD-related traits. Circulating 2-h GLP-1 and GIP concentrations measured during an oral glucose tolerance test showed hepatoprotective effects on MASLD risk (OR GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists offer promise in lowering MASLD/MASH risk. GIP receptor agonists can exert direct and indirect effects on MASLD mediated by weight reduction or glycemic control improvement. Show less

The relationship between plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the combined effects of Lp(a) levels on liver and vascular damage. The study was conducted using the Liver-Bible cohort of individuals with metabolic dysfunction (n = 859, 808 with genomic information) and the Milan Biobank (n = 6963). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were used to evaluate the inherited factors influencing plasma Lp(a) levels. In the Liver-Bible cohort, genetic variation in the LPA gene was the strongest determinant of Lp(a), followed by liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Additionally, circulating Lp(a) levels, but not genetic predisposition, were inversely related to LSM, suggesting that MASLD severity may affect Lp(a) secretion. Among participants with more severe insulin resistance (n = 250), Lp(a) levels (odds ratio 6.7, 95% CI 1.0-53.0, p = 0.046) and LSM (odds ratio 13.7, 95% CI 1.4-172.2, p = 0.023) were associated with greater prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques, regardless of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In the Milan Biobank, genetically predicted higher Lp(a) levels tended to increase the risk of liver-related outcomes, whereas genetically predicted MASLD was associated with lower circulating Lp(a) levels. The results of this study suggest that liver damage is more likely the cause of reduced plasma Lp(a) levels rather than a consequence. Assessing plasma Lp(a) levels and the extent of liver damage could improve the prediction of vascular damage. Show less