👤 Stefania Mira

Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention settings, it remains unclear whether Lp(a) contributes to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD. The current analysis combines the ATHEROREMO and IBIS-3 observational studies, which together enrolled 798 patients undergoing coronary angiography for stable angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy were performed to assess coronary plaque characteristics in a non-culprit study segment. Regression models were applied to relate Lp(a) to coronary plaque characteristics and long-term (up to 10 year) clinical outcomes. Lp(a) was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable (using 75 nmol/L and 125 nmol/L as threshold). Mean age of the patients was 61.6 years (10.8); 75% were male; 19% had elevated Lp(a) levels (>125 nmol/L). Patients with Lp(a) > 125 nmol/L had a significantly higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and prior percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients demonstrated higher IVUS-derived plaque burden (40.7% (±11.5) vs. 38.6% (±10.7), p = 0.028), though no associations were found with other plaque characteristics, e.g. minimum lumen area, lipid core burden index and thin-cap fibroatheroroma. No association was found between Lp(a) and -5-year major adverse cardiac events (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.70-1.60, p = 0.78) and 10-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38-1.06, p = 0.78). Among patients with established ASCVD, Lp(a) was associated with plaque burden, supporting evidence that relates Lp(a) to atherosclerotic disease. However, Lp(a) was not associated with long-term mortality or cardiac adverse events in these patients. Show less

The relationship between plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the combined effects of Lp(a) levels on liver and vascular damage. The study was conducted using the Liver-Bible cohort of individuals with metabolic dysfunction (n = 859, 808 with genomic information) and the Milan Biobank (n = 6963). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were used to evaluate the inherited factors influencing plasma Lp(a) levels. In the Liver-Bible cohort, genetic variation in the LPA gene was the strongest determinant of Lp(a), followed by liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Additionally, circulating Lp(a) levels, but not genetic predisposition, were inversely related to LSM, suggesting that MASLD severity may affect Lp(a) secretion. Among participants with more severe insulin resistance (n = 250), Lp(a) levels (odds ratio 6.7, 95% CI 1.0-53.0, p = 0.046) and LSM (odds ratio 13.7, 95% CI 1.4-172.2, p = 0.023) were associated with greater prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques, regardless of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In the Milan Biobank, genetically predicted higher Lp(a) levels tended to increase the risk of liver-related outcomes, whereas genetically predicted MASLD was associated with lower circulating Lp(a) levels. The results of this study suggest that liver damage is more likely the cause of reduced plasma Lp(a) levels rather than a consequence. Assessing plasma Lp(a) levels and the extent of liver damage could improve the prediction of vascular damage. Show less