👤 Hein Heidbuchel

Ageing endurance athletes have a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) than healthy controls, despite similarly low conventional cardiovascular risk. The predictive value of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] for CAD in these low-risk individuals remains unclear. The Master@Heart study included 558 men (aged 45-70 years) without known cardiovascular risk factors: 191 lifelong athletes, 191 late-onset athletes, and 176 healthy controls. CCTA assessed coronary artery calcification (CAC) and plaques. The association between Lp(a) and subclinical CAD was assessed using logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratios (ORs), adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. Lp(a) was analysed dichotomously (<125 vs. >125 nmol/L) and continuously (per 10 nmol/L increase). 76 participants (13.6%) had elevated Lp(a) levels (>125 nmol/L). Elevated Lp(a) was significantly associated with age-specific CAC percentile≥75 (OR 1.80, p=0.049) and ≥1 mixed plaque (OR 1.76, p=0.046). Other CAD measures all tended to be more prevalent in those with elevated Lp(a). In the continuous analysis, Lp(a) was significantly associated with CAC>100 (OR 1.03, p=0.045), CAC percentile≥75 (OR 1.04, p=0.014), and ≥1 mixed or non-calcified plaque (OR 1.03, p=0.029).Lp(a) and prevalence of elevated Lp(a) were similar across lifelong athletes, late-onset athletes, and controls (p=0.586 and p=0.724, respectively). No significant interaction was found between Lp(a) and the exercise groups in predicting CAD. Lp(a) is independently associated with subclinical CAD in ageing endurance athletes and healthy controls, despite similarly low conventional cardiovascular risk. Lp(a) does not explain the higher CAD prevalence in lifelong athletes compared to controls, but may enhance risk stratification in this low-risk population. Show less

The importance of genetic testing for cardiomyopathies has increased in the last decade. However, in heart transplant patients with former cardiomyopathy, genetic testing in retrospect is not routinely performed. We hypothesize that the yield of genetic testing in this population is considerable, and will have a major impact for both patients and relatives. Patients that underwent heart transplantation (HTx) between 1995 and 2020 and were still in follow-up, were offered genetic testing if the primary etiology was non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of known cardiomyopathy genes was performed and variants were classified as variant of unknown significance (class 3), likely pathogenic (class 4) or pathogenic (class 5) variant. Of the 99 HTx patients in active follow-up, only 6 patients had a genetic diagnosis at the time of HTx. In this study, 31 selected patients with prior non-ischemic cardiomyopathy underwent genetic testing post HTx. 23/31 patients (74.2%) carried a variant that was classified as class 3 or higher. In 12/31 patients a class 4/5 variant (38.7%) was identified, and in 11/31 patients (35.5%) a class 3 variant. Class 5 Variants in TTN were the most prevalent (7/31), followed by class 5 variants in MYBPC3 (2/31). A positive family history was present in 21/31 (67.7%) and a second precipitating factor (e.g., alcohol abuse, pregnancy) was present in 17/31 patients (54.8%). Diagnostic yield of genetic testing was similar between patients with or without familial history and/or second hit. Through cascade screening 48 family members were screened for presence of a class 4/5 variant, of whom 19 (39.6%) were genotype positive, of whom 10 (52.6%) showed a cardiac phenotype. Appropriate follow-up was offered. Genetic testing for cardiomyopathy genes established a molecular diagnosis in 38.7% of patients post HTx. These results highlight the importance of genetic testing in this population as it is still often overlooked in patients that already underwent HTx in the past. Genetic testing is highly recommended, independent of family history or second precipitating factors, as it might identify relatives at risk. Show less