👤 Constantijn Franssen

The importance of genetic testing for cardiomyopathies has increased in the last decade. However, in heart transplant patients with former cardiomyopathy, genetic testing in retrospect is not routinely performed. We hypothesize that the yield of genetic testing in this population is considerable, and will have a major impact for both patients and relatives. Patients that underwent heart transplantation (HTx) between 1995 and 2020 and were still in follow-up, were offered genetic testing if the primary etiology was non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of known cardiomyopathy genes was performed and variants were classified as variant of unknown significance (class 3), likely pathogenic (class 4) or pathogenic (class 5) variant. Of the 99 HTx patients in active follow-up, only 6 patients had a genetic diagnosis at the time of HTx. In this study, 31 selected patients with prior non-ischemic cardiomyopathy underwent genetic testing post HTx. 23/31 patients (74.2%) carried a variant that was classified as class 3 or higher. In 12/31 patients a class 4/5 variant (38.7%) was identified, and in 11/31 patients (35.5%) a class 3 variant. Class 5 Variants in TTN were the most prevalent (7/31), followed by class 5 variants in MYBPC3 (2/31). A positive family history was present in 21/31 (67.7%) and a second precipitating factor (e.g., alcohol abuse, pregnancy) was present in 17/31 patients (54.8%). Diagnostic yield of genetic testing was similar between patients with or without familial history and/or second hit. Through cascade screening 48 family members were screened for presence of a class 4/5 variant, of whom 19 (39.6%) were genotype positive, of whom 10 (52.6%) showed a cardiac phenotype. Appropriate follow-up was offered. Genetic testing for cardiomyopathy genes established a molecular diagnosis in 38.7% of patients post HTx. These results highlight the importance of genetic testing in this population as it is still often overlooked in patients that already underwent HTx in the past. Genetic testing is highly recommended, independent of family history or second precipitating factors, as it might identify relatives at risk. Show less

GPIHBP1 is an endothelial cell protein that binds lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and chylomicrons. Because GPIHBP1 deficiency causes chylomicronemia in mice, we sought to determine whether some cases of chylomicronemia in humans could be attributable to defective GPIHBP1 proteins. Patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia (n=60, with plasma triglycerides above the 95th percentile for age and gender) were screened for mutations in GPIHBP1. A homozygous GPIHBP1 mutation (c.344A>C) that changed a highly conserved glutamine at residue 115 to a proline (p.Q115P) was identified in a 33-year-old male with lifelong chylomicronemia. The patient had failure-to-thrive as a child but had no history of pancreatitis. He had no mutations in LPL, APOA5, or APOC2. The Q115P substitution did not affect the ability of GPIHBP1 to reach the cell surface. However, unlike wild-type GPIHBP1, GPIHBP1-Q115P lacked the ability to bind LPL or chylomicrons (d < 1.006 g/mL lipoproteins from Gpihbp1(-/-) mice). Mouse GPIHBP1 with the corresponding mutation (Q114P) also could not bind LPL. A homozygous missense mutation in GPIHBP1 (Q115P) was identified in a patient with chylomicronemia. The mutation eliminated the ability of GPIHBP1 to bind LPL and chylomicrons, strongly suggesting that it caused the patient's chylomicronemia. Show less