👤 Rishi Rikhi

The prognostic value of jointly assessing lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in primary prevention among individuals without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs) remains unclear. We analyzed 50,450 UK Biobank participants free of cardiovascular disease at baseline who were SMuRF-less, defined as absence of current smoking, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Elevated Lp(a) and hsCRP were defined using cohort-specific 75th percentile cutoffs and established clinical thresholds. Incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death, was ascertained. Associations were evaluated using Fine-Gray competing-risk regression models to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), accounting for competing non-cardiovascular death. Over 15 years of follow-up, 1,104 (2.2%) incident ASCVD events occurred. Using cohort-specific cutoffs, elevated hsCRP was associated with higher ASCVD risk (sHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.57), while elevated Lp(a) showed a more modest association (sHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45). In joint analyses, isolated elevations of hsCRP or Lp(a) were each associated with increased risk, with the highest risk observed among individuals with concurrent elevations (sHR 1.64, 95% CI 1.28-2.09), without evidence of interaction. Similar patterns were observed using clinical cutoffs (Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L; hsCRP ≥2.0 mg/L), with concurrent elevation conferring the greatest risk (sHR 1.74, 95% CI 1.17-2.59). In SMuRF-less individuals, Lp(a) and hsCRP independently predict ASCVD risk. These findings suggest that combined assessment of Lp(a) and hsCRP may provide complementary information for risk characterization among SMuRF-less adults in primary prevention. Show less

Insulin resistance (IR) and lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), are established contributors to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Whether IR modifies the association between Lp(a) and CVD in primary prevention remains uncertain. This prospective cohort study included UK Biobank participants without baseline CVD. IR at enrollment was assessed using the triglyceride-glucose index (TyG). The primary outcome was first major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for log-transformed Lp(a) and TyG, adjusting for each other. Lp(a) was categorized as <125 or ≥125 nmol/L; high IR was TyG ≥75th cohort percentile. Participants were stratified into 4 joint Lp(a)/IR groups using low Lp(a)/low IR as reference. Among 328 031 participants (mean age 56.4 years; 54.7% women), 26 865 CVD events occurred over 14.6 years median follow-up (interquartile range 13.7-15.4). Per 1-SD increase, aHRs were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for log-Lp(a) and 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for TyG, each adjusted for the other. The Lp(a) and IR each independently contribute to cardiovascular risk, with a combination offering improved risk stratification. This suggests that accounting for IR may enhance the assessment of Lp(a)-associated risk in the context of primary CVD prevention setting. Show less

Numerous studies have established lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as an independent and modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). As such Lp(a) has become the focus of targeted drug therapy development with the goal of reducing Lp(a) serum concentrations and improving outcomes. This review aims to inform readers on the investigational agents currently in clinical trials and highlight key differences including dosing intervals and routes of administration that may facilitate uptake and retention of a particular potential medication in certain patient populations. Five investigational agents are currently undergoing various stages of clinical trials for the treatment of elevated Lp(a). Three potential therapies are small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules and a fourth is an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) all of which are subcutaneously injected. A fifth agent is a small molecule inhibitor that is orally administered. A sixth agent, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that is primarily being studied for LDL-C reduction has shown promise for reducing Lp(a). A seventh agent based on gene-editing is currently in the developmental stage. Results have revealed notable reductions in Lp(a) with favorable tolerability and safety. Phase 3 trials will be crucial in determining the viability of lowering Lp(a) with such therapies and improving cardiovascular outcomes. Promising results indicate the potential in the near future to have medications primarily for lowering Lp(a) which has thus far eluded targeted drug therapy. As such advances stand to benefit large segments of the population living with and at risk for ASCVD, future research is vital to validate safety and efficacy in the long-term as well to understand how to optimize uptake and retention among patients with diverse circumstances. Show less

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, and vascular inflammation is one mechanism through which Lp(a) causes ASCVD. The authors aimed to evaluate whether interleukin-6 (IL-6), a biomarker associated with inflammation and cardiovascular disease, helps risk-stratify individuals with elevated Lp(a). Data from participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) (n = 6,514) and the UK Biobank (UKB) (n = 26,574) were used for this analysis. The associations between Lp(a) and IL-6 with coronary heart disease (CHD) (defined as myocardial infarction or resuscitated cardiac arrest), ASCVD (CHD and ischemic stroke), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) were evaluated separately and with mutual adjustment in Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). HRs were presented per standard deviation. Participants were also grouped by Lp(a) level (≤50 or >50 mg/dL [125 nmol/L]) and IL-6 level (≤ median or > median) in similar models. Participants with higher IL-6 levels were more likely to have higher body mass index, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and hsCRP with lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Lp(a) (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.23 in MESA; HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.09-1.13 in UKB) and IL-6 (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10-1.35 in MESA; HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.15-1.24 in UKB) were both independently associated with CHD events when evaluated separately. When evaluated together, no significant change was noted, and interaction testing was not significant. Similar results were seen for ASCVD and PVD. When participants were categorized by both Lp(a) and IL-6 levels, the strongest association for each outcome was noted when both levels were high (for CHD: HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.25-2.36 in MESA; HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.12-1.72 in UKB). In 2 independent primary prevention cohorts, Lp(a) and IL-6 were independent predictors of ASCVD risk, and their combination identified individuals at highest risk. Show less

Oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) are carried by apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins (OxPL-apoB) including lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]). Both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) have been associated with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). This study aimed to evaluate the associations between OxPL-apoB, Lp(a) and the prevalence, incidence, and progression of CAVD. OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were evaluated in MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) and a participant-level meta-analysis of 4 randomized trials of participants with established aortic stenosis (AS). In MESA, the association of OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) with aortic valve calcium (AVC) at baseline and 9.5 years was evaluated using multivariable ordinal regression models. In the meta-analysis, the association between OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) with AS progression (annualized change in peak aortic valve jet velocity) was evaluated using multivariable linear regression models. In MESA, both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were associated with prevalent AVC (OR per SD: 1.19 [95% CI: 1.07-1.32] and 1.13 [95% CI: 1.01-1.27], respectively) with a significant interaction between the two (P < 0.01). Both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were associated with incident AVC at 9.5 years when evaluated individually (interaction P < 0.01). The OxPL-apoB∗Lp(a) interaction demonstrated higher odds of prevalent and incident AVC for OxPL-apoB with increasing Lp(a) levels. In the meta-analysis, when analyzed separately, both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were associated with faster increase in peak aortic valve jet velocity, but when evaluated together, only OxPL-apoB remained significant (ß: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01-0.12). OxPL-apoB is a predictor of the presence, incidence, and progression of AVC and established AS, particularly in the setting of elevated Lp(a) levels, and may represent a novel therapeutic target for CAVD. Show less