👤 Seamus P Whelton

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) are causally linked to aortic valve calcium (AVC) and aortic stenosis (AS). Lipoprotein(a) has anti-fibrinolytic properties; therefore, aspirin may reduce cardiovascular disease risk among individuals with high Lp(a). This analysis sought to determine the association of aspirin with incident AVC and AS across Lp(a) and LDL-C levels. This observational study included up to 6598 participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Aortic valve calcium was measured on non-contrast cardiac computed tomography. Multivariable Cox hazards regression assessed the association of self-reported regular aspirin use (≥3 days/week) with incident AVC and severe AS, stratified by Lp(a) and LDL-C. Aortic valve calcium and Lp(a) values were not reported to participants. Mean age was 62 years, 53% were women, 23% reported regular aspirin use, 8% developed AVC (median 8.9 years), and 1% developed severe AS (median 16.7 years). Among individuals with elevated Lp(a), regular aspirin use was associated with a lower risk of incident AVC (Lp(a) ≥75 mg/dL: hazard ratio (HR) .42, 95% confidence interval (CI) .19-.93; Lp(a) ≥100 mg/dL: HR .17, 95% CI .04-.67) and severe AS (Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL: HR .13, 95% CI: .04-.47; Lp(a) ≥75 mg/dL: HR .02, 95% CI .001-.29). For participants with elevated LDL-C, there was no association of regular aspirin use with incident AVC (LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL: HR 1.02, 95% CI .66-1.58; LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL: HR 1.51, 95% CI .53-4.28) or severe AS (LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL: HR .70, 95% CI .39-1.26; LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL: HR .46, 95% CI .14-1.47). In this exploratory analysis of prospective observational cohort data, regular aspirin use was associated with a lower risk of AVC and severe AS in persons with high Lp(a), but not high LDL-C. Confirmatory studies are required to determine the role of aspirin in the prevention of AVC and AS for persons with high Lp(a). Show less

Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) is a known cardiovascular risk factor; however, its role in cardiac remodeling and functional changes over time across diverse racial and ethnic groups remains underexplored. MESA is a prospective multi-ethnic cohort study of individuals without a history of cardiovascular disease on enrollment (2000-2002), conducted across 6 sites in the United States. Participants with baseline Lp(a) measurements and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at both baseline and 10-year follow-up exam were included. Lp(a) was treated as both a log-transformed continuous variable (per SD log) and a categorical variable based on data-driven Lp(a) terciles. Multivariable regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, and cardiovascular risk factors, including coronary artery calcium and interim myocardial infarction, were used to assess associations between Lp(a) and longitudinal changes in left ventricular and atrial structure and function over a decade across different racial/ethnic groups. A total of 2366 participants were included. The average age at baseline was 60±9 with 53% women, 43% White, 24% Black, 21% Hispanic, and 12% Chinese. Each 1-SD increase in log-transformed Lp(a) was associated with an increase in left ventricular end-systolic volume index (β, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.02-1.18]), and left atrial minimum volume index (β, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.09-1.52]), and a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (β, -0.75 [95% CI, -1.34 to -0.17]), and total left atrial emptying fraction (β, -1.17 [95% CI, -2.09 to -0.24]) in Hispanic subjects over a decade. No significant associations were seen in White, Black, or Chinese participants. The observed findings persisted after adjusting for coronary artery calcium, interim myocardial infarction, and atrioventricular decoupling, and when Lp(a) was treated as a categorical variable with race-specific terciles. Elevated Lp(a) levels were independently associated with maladaptive left ventricular and left atrial remodeling in Hispanic adults over a decade, while no statistically significant relationships were observed in White, Black, and Chinese participants. This suggests a unique susceptibility of Hispanic individuals to Lp(a)-mediated cardiovascular remodeling, independent of ischemic pathways. Show less

In anticipation of updates to cholesterol guidelines globally, evidence since the most recent iteration of recommendations across US and Europe for risk assessment and lipid management are reviewed. ASCVD risk estimation is at the core of determining lipid lowering goals and consideration for therapies. In primary prevention, incorporation of the PREVENT equations will be featured in updated guidelines, which will likely demarcate new, lower risk thresholds compared to the prior Pooled Cohort Equations. Additionally, the use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) improves risk estimation to inform medication allocation and LDL-C goals beyond traditional risk factor risk estimation. To achieve lower LDL-C, many adults will need multiple lipid-lowering medications. For high-risk individuals, combination therapy with low/moderate intensity statin and ezetimibe or bempedoic acid should be considered. Additionally, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapies can be used to attain lower LDL-C in high-risk individuals, including those with clinical ASCVD or a high CAC burden. In very-high risk patients, treatment to LDL-C values as low as <30 mg/dL further reduces ASCVD risk without significant adverse events. Among individuals treated with PSCK9i therapy, those with elevated Lp(a) may have greater ASCVD risk reduction and may be a patient population that is prioritized for PCSK9i until therapies directly targeting Lp(a) are available. An ASCVD risk-based approach should be the foundation for determining LDL-C goals with consideration that multiple lipid-lowering therapies are often necessary for high and very-high risk patients who were treated to very low LDL-C in more recent randomized controlled trials. Show less

The 2025 American Society for Preventive Cardiology meeting highlighted evolving strategies in cardiovascular disease prevention, spanning risk models based on traditional risk factors, emerging biomarkers, novel therapeutics, and digital health innovations. Key discussions addressed lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and inflammation as a causal risk factor, their clinical management, and readiness for targeted therapies; optimal systolic blood pressure targets informed by recent randomized controlled trials; and ongoing debate regarding apolipoprotein B versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as the primary lipid target. Advances in digital health emphasized prevention through artificial intelligence, health equity in technology, and the growing role of wearables. Imaging emerged as a central theme, with sessions highlighting its role in risk assessment, monitoring treatment response, and refining prevention strategies, especially in young adults. Sessions on women's cardiovascular health underscored female-specific risk enhancers and limitations of current risk prediction models. Additional debates addressed the use of polygenic risk scores in young adults and strategies for universal screening with LDL-C, hsCRP, and Lp(a). Heart failure prevention was highlighted as a critical frontier, with emphasis on stage-based risk stratification, early identification of subclinical disease, and targeted interventions to avert progression to symptomatic heart failure. Updates on renal denervation reaffirmed its safety, efficacy, and durability as an adjunctive therapy in resistant hypertension. Collectively, these highlights emphasize the rapid evolution of preventive cardiology, integrating precision risk stratification, digital tools, and novel therapies into routine care. Show less

Oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) are carried by apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins (OxPL-apoB) including lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]). Both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) have been associated with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). This study aimed to evaluate the associations between OxPL-apoB, Lp(a) and the prevalence, incidence, and progression of CAVD. OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were evaluated in MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) and a participant-level meta-analysis of 4 randomized trials of participants with established aortic stenosis (AS). In MESA, the association of OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) with aortic valve calcium (AVC) at baseline and 9.5 years was evaluated using multivariable ordinal regression models. In the meta-analysis, the association between OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) with AS progression (annualized change in peak aortic valve jet velocity) was evaluated using multivariable linear regression models. In MESA, both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were associated with prevalent AVC (OR per SD: 1.19 [95% CI: 1.07-1.32] and 1.13 [95% CI: 1.01-1.27], respectively) with a significant interaction between the two (P < 0.01). Both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were associated with incident AVC at 9.5 years when evaluated individually (interaction P < 0.01). The OxPL-apoB∗Lp(a) interaction demonstrated higher odds of prevalent and incident AVC for OxPL-apoB with increasing Lp(a) levels. In the meta-analysis, when analyzed separately, both OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) were associated with faster increase in peak aortic valve jet velocity, but when evaluated together, only OxPL-apoB remained significant (ß: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01-0.12). OxPL-apoB is a predictor of the presence, incidence, and progression of AVC and established AS, particularly in the setting of elevated Lp(a) levels, and may represent a novel therapeutic target for CAVD. Show less