👤 Jens Lättig

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
2
Articles
articles
Louise Schelletter, Oliver Hertel, Shareef Jarvi Antar +4 more · 2021 · Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
High-throughput reliable data generation has become a substantial requirement in many "omics" investigations. In proteomics the sample preparation workflow consists of multiple steps adding more bias Show more
High-throughput reliable data generation has become a substantial requirement in many "omics" investigations. In proteomics the sample preparation workflow consists of multiple steps adding more bias to the sample with each additional manual step. Especially for label-free quantification experiments, this drastically impedes reproducible quantification of proteins in replicates. Here, a positive pressure workstation was evaluated to increase automation of sample preparation and reduce workload as well as consumables. Digested peptide samples were purified utilizing a new semi-automated sample preparation device, the Resolvex A200, followed by nanospray liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization (nLC/ESI) Orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) measurements. In addition, the sorbents Maestro and WWP2 (available in conventional cartridge and dual-chamber narrow-bore extraction columns) were compared with Sep-Pak C18 cartridges. Raw data was analyzed by MaxQuant and Perseus software. The semi-automated workflow with the Resolvex A200 workstation and both new sorbents produced highly reproducible results within 10-300 μg of peptide starting material. The new workflow performed equally as well as the routinely conducted manual workflow with similar technical variability in MS/MS-based identifications of peptides and proteins. A first application of the system to a biological question contributed to highly reliable results, where time-resolved proteomic data was separated by principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering. The new workstation was successfully established for proteolytic peptide purification in our proteomic workflow without any drawbacks. Highly reproducible results were obtained in decreased time per sample, which will facilitate further large-scale proteomic investigations. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8873
WWP2
Tahir Yaqub, Irina G Tikhonova, Jens Lättig +6 more · 2010 · Molecular pharmacology · added 2026-04-24
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), a member of family B of the G-protein coupled receptors, is a potential therapeutic target for which discovery of nonpeptide ligands is hi Show more
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), a member of family B of the G-protein coupled receptors, is a potential therapeutic target for which discovery of nonpeptide ligands is highly desirable. Structure-activity relationship studies indicated that the N-terminal part of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is crucial for biological activity. Here, we aimed at identification of residues in the GIPR involved in functional interaction with N-terminal moiety of GIP. A homology model of the transmembrane core of GIPR was constructed, whereas a three-dimensional model of the complex formed between GIP and the N-terminal extracellular domain of GIPR was taken from the crystal structure. The latter complex was docked to the transmembrane domains of GIPR, allowing in silico identification of putative residues of the agonist binding/activation site. All mutants were expressed at the surface of human embryonic kidney 293 cells as indicated by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy analysis of fluorescent GIP binding. Mutation of residues Arg183, Arg190, Arg300, and Phe357 caused shifts of 76-, 71-, 42-, and 16-fold in the potency to induce cAMP formation, respectively. Further characterization of these mutants, including tests with alanine-substituted GIP analogs, were in agreement with interaction of Glu3 in GIP with Arg183 in GIPR. Furthermore, they strongly supported a binding mode of GIP to GIPR in which the N-terminal moiety of GIP was sited within transmembrane helices (TMH) 2, 3, 5, and 6 with biologically crucial Tyr1 interacting with Gln224 (TMH3), Arg300 (TMH5), and Phe357 (TMH6). These data represent an important step toward understanding activation of GIPR by GIP, which should facilitate the rational design of therapeutic agents. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1124/mol.109.060111
GIPR