👤 Daniel Fourmy

GIP is well known as a peptide regulating metabolic functions. In this review paper, we summarize a series of data on GIP receptor (GIPR). First, expression study of GIPR in human neuroendocrine tumours showed a very high incidence (nearly 100%) and a high density in both functional and non functional pancreatic tumours, ileal tumours, bronchial tumours and medullary thyroid carcinomas. Then, data on internalization of GIPR following stimulation by GIP are reported. Rapid and abundant internalization of GIPR also found in tumor pancreatic endocrine cells opens the possibility of tumor imaging and eradication using radiolabeled GIP. Interestingly, internalized GIPR continues to signal in early endosomes stimulating production of cAMP and activation of PKA, thus, supporting the view that GIPR signals from both plasma membrane and vesicles of internalization. At last, we summarize data from studies using in synergy molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, which identified crucial amino acids of transmembrane domains of GIPR involved in GIPR binding site of GIP and/or in its activation and coupling to Gs protein. All together, these last molecular data may help to better understand structure-activity relationship data on GIP and GIPR. Show less

G-protein coupled receptors represent the largest family of membrane receptors. G-protein dependent signal of GPCR is classically thought to originate exclusively from the plasma membrane and, until very recently, internalized GPCRs were considered silent. At present, experimental proofs exist showing that GPCR can continue to signal via G proteins after internalization. We demonstrated that, once internalized in early endosomes, Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Peptide Receptor (GIPR) continues to stimulate production of cAMP and activate PKA. In addition to indirect proofs showing that kinetics of cAMP production and PKA activation depend on internalization and GIPR trafficking, we identified the active form of Gαs on early endosomes containing GIPR and detected a distinct FRET signal accounting for cAMP production at the surface of endosomes containing GIP, relative to endosomes without GIP. Show less

Until very recently, G-protein dependent signal of GPCRs was thought to originate exclusively from the plasma membrane and internalized GPCRs were considered silent. Here, we demonstrated that, once internalized and located in the membrane of early endosomes, glucose-dependent Insulinotropic receptor (GIPR) continues to trigger production of cAMP and PKA activation. Direct evidence is based on identification of the active form of Gαs in early endosomes containing GIPR using a genetically encoded GFP tagged nanobody, and on detection of a distinct FRET signal accounting for cAMP production at the surface of endosomes containing GIP, compared to endosomes without GIP. Furthermore, decrease of the sustained phase of cAMP production and PKA activation kinetics as well as reversibility of cAMP production and PKA activity following GIP washout in cells treated with a pharmacological inhibitor of GIPR internalization, and continuous increase of cAMP level over time in the presence of dominant-negative Rab7, which causes accumulation of early endosomes in cells, were noticed. Hence the GIPR joins the few GPCRs which signal through G-proteins both at plasma membrane and on endosomes. Show less

How incretins regulate presence of their receptors at the cell surface and their activity is of paramount importance for the development of therapeutic strategies targeting these receptors. We have studied internalization of the human Glucose-Insulinotropic Polypeptide receptor (GIPR). GIP stimulated rapid robust internalization of the GIPR, the major part being directed to lysosomes. GIPR internalization involved mainly clathrin-coated pits, AP-2 and dynamin. However, neither GIPR C-terminal region nor β-arrestin1/2 was required. Finally, N-acetyl-GIP recognized as a dipeptidyl-IV resistant analogue, fully stimulated cAMP production with a ∼15-fold lower potency than GIP and weakly stimulated GIPR internalization and desensitization of cAMP response. Furthermore, docking N-acetyl-GIP in the binding site of modeled GIPR showed slighter interactions with residues of helices 6 and 7 of GIPR compared to GIP. Therefore, incomplete or partial activity of N-acetyl-GIP on signaling involved in GIPR desensitization and internalization contributes to the enhanced incretin activity of this peptide. Show less

Innovative crystallographic techniques have resulted in an exponential growth in the number of solved G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) structures and a better understanding of the mechanisms of class A receptor activation and G protein binding. The recent release of the type 1 receptor for the corticotropin-releasing factor and the glucagon receptor structures, two members of the secretin-like family, gives the opportunity to understand these mechanisms of activation in this family of GPCRs. Here, we addressed the comparison of the functional elements of class A and secretin-like GPCRs, using the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) as a model receptor. Inactive and active models of GIPR permitted to select, by structural homology with class A GPCRs, several residues that may form key interactions presumably involved in receptor activation and Gs coupling, for pharmacological evaluation. Mutants on these amino acids were expressed in HEKT 293 cells and characterized in terms of GIP-induced cAMP production. We identified various functional domains spanning from the peptide-binding to the G protein pockets: including: a network linking the extracellular part of transmembrane (TM) 6 with TMs 2 and 7; a polar lock that resembles the ionic-lock in class A GPCRs; an interaction between TMs 3 and 7 that favors activation; and two clusters of polar/charged and of hydrophobic residues that interact with the C-terminus of the Gα. The results show that despite the low degree of sequence similarity between rhodopsin- and secretin-like GPCRs, the two families share conserved elements in their mechanisms of activation and G protein binding. Show less

A new family of peptide receptors, the incretin receptor family, overexpressed on many neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is of great importance because it may enable the in vivo peptide-based receptor targeting of a category of NETs that does not express the somatostatin receptor. Impressive in vivo diagnostic data were published for glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor-targeting radiopeptides. Recently, promising in vitro data have appeared for the second member of the incretin family, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor. This prompted us to develop and evaluate a new class of radioligands with the potential to be used for the in vivo targeting of GIP receptor-positive tumors. GIP(1-42) was modified C-terminally, and the truncated peptides [Lys(30)(aminohexanoic acid [Ahx]-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG1), [Lys(16)(Ahx-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG2), and [Nle(14), Lys(30)(Ahx-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG4) were conjugated with Ahx-DOTA via the Lys(16) and Lys(30) side chains. Their inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) was determined using [(125)I-Tyr(10)]GIP(1-30) as radioligand and GIP(1-30) as control peptide. The DOTA conjugates were labeled with (111)In and (68)Ga. In vitro evaluation included saturation and internalization studies using the pancreatic endocrine cell line INR1G9 transfected with the human GIP receptor (INR1G9-hGIPr). The in vivo evaluation consisted of biodistribution and PET imaging studies on nude mice bearing INR1G9-hGIPr tumors. Binding studies (IC50 and saturation studies) showed high affinity toward GIP receptor for the GIP conjugates. Specific in vitro internalization was found, and almost the entire cell-associated activity was internalized (>90% of the cell-bound activity), supporting the agonist potency of the (111)In-vectors. (111)In-EG4 and (68)Ga-EG4 were shown to specifically target INR1G9-hGIPr xenografts, with tumor uptake of 10.4% ± 2.2% and 17.0% ± 4.4% injected activity/g, 1 h after injection, respectively. Kidneys showed the highest uptake, which could be reduced by approximately 40%-50% with a modified-fluid-gelatin plasma substitute or an inhibitor of the serine protease dipeptidyl peptidase 4. The PET images clearly visualized the tumor. The evaluation of EG4 as a proof-of-principle radioligand indicated the feasibility of imaging GIP receptor-positive tumors. These results prompt us to continue the development of this family of radioligands for imaging of a broad spectrum of NETs. Show less

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), a member of family B of the G-protein coupled receptors, is a potential therapeutic target for which discovery of nonpeptide ligands is highly desirable. Structure-activity relationship studies indicated that the N-terminal part of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is crucial for biological activity. Here, we aimed at identification of residues in the GIPR involved in functional interaction with N-terminal moiety of GIP. A homology model of the transmembrane core of GIPR was constructed, whereas a three-dimensional model of the complex formed between GIP and the N-terminal extracellular domain of GIPR was taken from the crystal structure. The latter complex was docked to the transmembrane domains of GIPR, allowing in silico identification of putative residues of the agonist binding/activation site. All mutants were expressed at the surface of human embryonic kidney 293 cells as indicated by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy analysis of fluorescent GIP binding. Mutation of residues Arg183, Arg190, Arg300, and Phe357 caused shifts of 76-, 71-, 42-, and 16-fold in the potency to induce cAMP formation, respectively. Further characterization of these mutants, including tests with alanine-substituted GIP analogs, were in agreement with interaction of Glu3 in GIP with Arg183 in GIPR. Furthermore, they strongly supported a binding mode of GIP to GIPR in which the N-terminal moiety of GIP was sited within transmembrane helices (TMH) 2, 3, 5, and 6 with biologically crucial Tyr1 interacting with Gln224 (TMH3), Arg300 (TMH5), and Phe357 (TMH6). These data represent an important step toward understanding activation of GIPR by GIP, which should facilitate the rational design of therapeutic agents. Show less