👤 Marie-Julie Gherardi

Until very recently, G-protein dependent signal of GPCRs was thought to originate exclusively from the plasma membrane and internalized GPCRs were considered silent. Here, we demonstrated that, once internalized and located in the membrane of early endosomes, glucose-dependent Insulinotropic receptor (GIPR) continues to trigger production of cAMP and PKA activation. Direct evidence is based on identification of the active form of Gαs in early endosomes containing GIPR using a genetically encoded GFP tagged nanobody, and on detection of a distinct FRET signal accounting for cAMP production at the surface of endosomes containing GIP, compared to endosomes without GIP. Furthermore, decrease of the sustained phase of cAMP production and PKA activation kinetics as well as reversibility of cAMP production and PKA activity following GIP washout in cells treated with a pharmacological inhibitor of GIPR internalization, and continuous increase of cAMP level over time in the presence of dominant-negative Rab7, which causes accumulation of early endosomes in cells, were noticed. Hence the GIPR joins the few GPCRs which signal through G-proteins both at plasma membrane and on endosomes. Show less

How incretins regulate presence of their receptors at the cell surface and their activity is of paramount importance for the development of therapeutic strategies targeting these receptors. We have studied internalization of the human Glucose-Insulinotropic Polypeptide receptor (GIPR). GIP stimulated rapid robust internalization of the GIPR, the major part being directed to lysosomes. GIPR internalization involved mainly clathrin-coated pits, AP-2 and dynamin. However, neither GIPR C-terminal region nor β-arrestin1/2 was required. Finally, N-acetyl-GIP recognized as a dipeptidyl-IV resistant analogue, fully stimulated cAMP production with a ∼15-fold lower potency than GIP and weakly stimulated GIPR internalization and desensitization of cAMP response. Furthermore, docking N-acetyl-GIP in the binding site of modeled GIPR showed slighter interactions with residues of helices 6 and 7 of GIPR compared to GIP. Therefore, incomplete or partial activity of N-acetyl-GIP on signaling involved in GIPR desensitization and internalization contributes to the enhanced incretin activity of this peptide. Show less

Innovative crystallographic techniques have resulted in an exponential growth in the number of solved G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) structures and a better understanding of the mechanisms of class A receptor activation and G protein binding. The recent release of the type 1 receptor for the corticotropin-releasing factor and the glucagon receptor structures, two members of the secretin-like family, gives the opportunity to understand these mechanisms of activation in this family of GPCRs. Here, we addressed the comparison of the functional elements of class A and secretin-like GPCRs, using the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) as a model receptor. Inactive and active models of GIPR permitted to select, by structural homology with class A GPCRs, several residues that may form key interactions presumably involved in receptor activation and Gs coupling, for pharmacological evaluation. Mutants on these amino acids were expressed in HEKT 293 cells and characterized in terms of GIP-induced cAMP production. We identified various functional domains spanning from the peptide-binding to the G protein pockets: including: a network linking the extracellular part of transmembrane (TM) 6 with TMs 2 and 7; a polar lock that resembles the ionic-lock in class A GPCRs; an interaction between TMs 3 and 7 that favors activation; and two clusters of polar/charged and of hydrophobic residues that interact with the C-terminus of the Gα. The results show that despite the low degree of sequence similarity between rhodopsin- and secretin-like GPCRs, the two families share conserved elements in their mechanisms of activation and G protein binding. Show less