👤 Wayne Nicholls

Most patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia fail to achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering. Here we carried out a randomized trial to test the safety and efficacy of obicetrapib, a highly selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor that lowers LDL cholesterol levels in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and an LDL cholesterol level ≥70 mg dl Show less

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition reduces low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) while simultaneously increasing high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and improving HDL-particle functionality. These lipoprotein modifications may provide a novel pathway for Alzheimer disease (AD) prevention through effects on lipid modulation, antioxidant activity, and neuro-inflammation. This approach could prove particularly beneficial for APOE4 carriers, who face elevated risks for both AD and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). To examine the effects of obicetrapib, an oral CETP inhibitor, on biomarker changes indicative of AD pathology among patients with ASCVD DESIGN: This was a pre-specified substudy of the BROADWAY trial, a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal registration trial to evaluate the LDL-C lowering efficacy of obicetrapib in adult patients with established ASCVD and/or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), whose LDL-C was not adequately controlled, despite being on maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. The trial was conducted across 188 sites in China, Europe, Japan, and the United States. Participants were recruited from cardiology clinics and lipid specialty centers from 2021 to 2024. Participants with ASCVD in BROADWAY who had known ApoE status and phosphorylated tau-217 (p-tau217) measured at baseline and 12 months. Participants in BROADWAY were randomized 2:1 to receive oral obicetrapib 10 mg daily or placebo for 12 months. AD plasma biomarkers were measured at baseline and 12 months using standardized SIMOA assays. The key outcome measure of interest was change in plasma p-tau217 from baseline to 12 months. Other outcome measures included changes in p-tau217/(Aβ42:40), p-tau181, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). The analysis population consisted of 1535 (61 %) of the 2530 BROADWAY participants. Median age was 67 years and 67.0 % were male. Baseline p-tau217 levels varied significantly by ApoE subgroups, with ApoE4 carriers generally having higher concentrations and ApoE4/E4 participants exhibiting the highest median concentration (0.56 pg/mL). Obicetrapib significantly attenuated p-tau217 increases compared to placebo (adjusted mean 2.09 % vs 4.94 %; P = 0.025). Treatment differences were most pronounced in ApoE4 carriers, where adjusted mean increases were 1.92 % and 6.91 %, for obicetrapib and placebo, respectively (P = 0.041). Furthermore, among ApoE4/E4 participants, there was a 7.81 % adjusted mean decrease in p-tau217 with obicetrapib compared to a 12.67 % increase with placebo, representing a 20.48 % treatment difference (P = 0.010). Positive trends were observed across secondary biomarkers, with obicetrapib also significantly limiting increases in the p-tau217/Aβ42:40 ratio compared to placebo (2.51 % vs 6.55 %; P = 0.004). In addition, among ApoE4/E4 participants, obicetrapib demonstrated significant effects on GFAP (-6.39 % vs +8.85 %; P = 0.006) and NfL (-10.49 % vs +6.82 %; P = 0.020). Strong correlations were observed between end-of-study obicetrapib plasma concentrations and biomarker improvements (r=-0.64), suggesting CETP inhibition as a potential mechanism, although other drug effects may also contribute to these changes. Obicetrapib significantly slowed AD biomarker progression over 12 months in participants with ASCVD, with the greatest effects in ApoE4 carriers. Among ApoE4/E4 participants, obicetrapib reduced p-tau217 levels by a placebo-adjusted 20.48 % and demonstrated consistent effects across multiple AD biomarkers. These findings represent the first demonstration of an oral intervention capable of reducing both beta-amyloid and tau pathology biomarkers in ApoE4 carriers, offering a potential preventive strategy for this high-risk population who currently have no effective prevention options. Future research will need to establish whether these biomarker changes translate to clinical benefits in dedicated AD prevention trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05142722. Show less

Limited targeted agents are approved for pediatric sarcomas. Tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy in some, but not all, young sarcoma patients. A major obstacle preventing further advances and clinical implementation is the lack of predictive response biomarkers to guide TK-targeted treatments. TK-activating fusions or mutations are rare in these patients. RNA overexpression of TKs is a frequent feature. The unresolved question is when upregulated TK expression is associated with kinase activation and signaling dependence. We explored the TK molecular landscape of 107 sarcoma patients from the ZERO Childhood Cancer precision medicine program (ZERO) using whole genomic and transcriptomic sequencing. Phosphoproteomic analyses of tyrosine phosphorylation (pY) and functional in vitro and in vivo assays were performed in cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Our analysis shows that although novel genomic driver lesions are rare, when present they are therapeutically actionable as exemplified by a novel LSM1-FGFR1 fusion identified in an osteosarcoma patient. We further show that in certain contexts, TK RNA expression can indicate TK pathway activity and predict TK-inhibitor sensitivity. We highlight the utility of FGFR-inhibitors in PAX3-FOXO1 fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcomas (FP-RMS) characterized by high FGFR4 and FGF8 RNA expression levels, and FGFR4 activation (FGFR4_pY). We demonstrate marked tumor growth inhibition in all FP-RMS PDXs treated with single agent FGF401 (FGFR4-specific inhibitor) and single agent lenvatinib (multi-kinase FGFR-inhibitor), and report a clinical response to lenvatinib in a relapsed metastatic FP-RMS patient. Altogether, we identified new sarcoma patients who may benefit from FGFR-inhibitors, most notably FP-rhabdomyosarcoma via FGFR4/FGF8 co-expression. Show less

The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor obicetrapib decreases levels of atherogenic lipids and raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). In this study, we sought to determine the effect of obicetrapib on cardiovascular events. The effects of 10 mg obicetrapib and placebo daily on major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates were investigated in a pooled analysis of 354 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and 2,530 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) over 365 days. The association between on-treatment lipids and MACE were also investigated. The cohort (mean age 66 years, 36% female, ASCVD 82%, HeFH 27%, diabetes 35%) had median baseline levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 92 mg/dL, HDL-C 48 mg/dL, apolipoprotein B (ApoB) 88 mg/dL, non-HDL-C 116 mg/dL, and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) 40.5 nmol/L. Obicetrapib produced greater reductions in LDL-C (-34.0 vs -4.0 mg/dL, -37.8% vs -4.6%), ApoB (-19.0 vs -3.0 mg/dL, -21.7% vs -3.6%), non-HDL-C (-36.0 vs -4.0 mg/dL, -32.4% vs -3.7%), and Lp(a) (-9.8 vs 0 nmol/L, -32.5% vs 0%) and increased HDL-C (+68.0 vs +1.0 mg/dL, +140.0% vs +1.5%). The rate of coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization was lower with obicetrapib (3.9% vs 5.0%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.54-1.11; P = 0.16), with a risk reduction in the second 6 months (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37-0.99; P = 0.04). The rate of coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization was lower with obicetrapib (3.2% vs 4.7%; HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46-1.00; P = 0.048), with a risk reduction in the second 6 months (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26-0.77; P = 0.003). Achieved levels of LDL-C (P = 0.003), ApoB (P = 0.007), non-HDL-C (P = 0.01), Lp(a) (P = 0.003), and HDL-C (P = 0.0001) were associated with event rates. Obicetrapib treatment associated with a reduction in coronary events, evident beyond 6 months of treatment. Show less

Type 2 diabetic patients exhibited an increased secretion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with a greater amount of small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Given that apolipoprotein B (apoB), a proatherogenic lipoprotein, exists at both triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and LDL particles, circulating apoB may associate with diabetic coronary atherosclerosis. The OPTIMAL study was a prospective randomized-controlled study which employed serial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)/intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging to evaluate the efficacy of glycemic control on coronary atherosclerosis in 94 statin-treated type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (UMIN000036721). Of these, 78 patients with both serial apoB levels and NIRS/IVUS images at baseline and week 48 were analyzed. NIRS/IVUS-derived plaque measures were compared in those with and without any reduction of apoB levels. All of the study subjects received a statin, and 60.6% of the study subjects exhibited any reduction of apoB levels. There was no significant difference in the atheroma progression rate between the 2 groups (-0.27 ± 0.15% vs -0.33 ± 0.51%, P = .44). However, patients with any reduction of apoB levels exhibited a greater frequency of change in maximal lipid-core burden index at 4-mm segment (maxLCBI In statin-treated type 2 diabetic patients with CAD, a greater delipidation of coronary atherosclerosis was observed in association with a reduction of apoB levels. The current findings indicate a potential anti-atherosclerotic effect of lowering apoB levels, which may ultimately mitigate future coronary events risk in statin-treated type 2 diabetic patients with CAD. Show less

Mixed dyslipidaemia, characterised by elevated concentrations of circulating triglycerides and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Solbinsiran, a GalNAc-conjugated small interfering RNA targeting hepatic angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3), reduced triglycerides and LDL-C concentrations in a phase 1 study. This study aimed to assess the durability and efficacy of solbinsiran in reducing concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins in adults with mixed dyslipidaemia. This double-blind, parallel-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with mixed dyslipidaemia at 41 clinical research units across seven countries. Patients receiving moderate-intensity or high-intensity statins, and with concentrations of fasting triglycerides between 1·69 mmol/L and 5·64 mmol/L, LDL-C of at least 1·81 mmol/L, and non-HDL cholesterol of at least 3·36 mmol/L were included. Using an interactive web-response system, patients were randomly assigned (1:2:2:2) to receive either solbinsiran 100 mg, solbinsiran 400 mg, solbinsiran 800 mg, or placebo, by subcutaneous injection on days 0 and 90. Patients were followed up for at least 270 days. The primary outcome was percent change in apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentration from baseline to day 180 with solbinsiran compared with placebo, analysed under an efficacy estimand (in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug). This trial is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05256654. Of 585 patients screened, 205 patients were enrolled in the study between July 20, 2022, and March 4, 2024. Patients (111 [54%] female and 94 [46%] male; median age 57 years [IQR 49-65]) were randomly assigned to receive solbinsiran 100 mg (n=30), solbinsiran 400 mg (n=58), solbinsiran 800 mg (n=59), or placebo (n=58). At baseline, median concentrations were 111 mg/dL (IQR 96-130) for apoB, 2·64 mmol/L (2·06-3·29) for triglycerides, and 3·16 mmol/L (2·57-3·82) for LDL-C. The placebo-adjusted percent change in apoB concentration from baseline at day 180 was -2·8% (95% CI -15·5 to 11·9; p=0·69) for solbinsiran 100 mg; -14·3% (-23·6 to -3·9; p=0·0085) for solbinsiran 400 mg; and -8·3% (-18·3 to 2·9; p=0·14) for solbinsiran 800 mg. Solbinsiran administration was well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events. The number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events was 18 [60%] of 30 patients in the solbinsiran 100 mg group, 30 [52%] of 58 patients in the solbinsiran 400 mg group, 26 [44%] of 59 patients in the solbinsiran 800 mg group, and 37 [65%] of 57 patients in the placebo group. Solbinsiran 400 mg reduced apoB in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and was generally well tolerated. The impact of solbinsiran on cardiovascular outcomes remains to be investigated. Eli Lilly and Company. Show less

Addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor, evolocumab, to statin therapy promoted coronary plaque stabilization after an acute coronary syndrome. While apolipoprotein B (ApoB) has been proposed as a goal for lipid-lowering therapy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, its association with plaque stability has not been studied. The High-Resolution Assessment of Coronary Plaques in a Global Evolocumab Randomized Study (HUYGENS) used serial optical coherence tomography to assess coronary plaque phenotypes in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with evolocumab plus statin or placebo plus statin for 52 weeks. Changes in plaque composition were studied in patients according to achievement of a goal ApoB level <65 mg/dL. Of 112 patients, 67 (59.8 %) achieved the ApoB goal and had lower ApoB values at follow-up compared with those not at goal (37.1 ± 15.0 vs 92.7 ± 19.4 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Patients achieving the ApoB goal demonstrated a greater increase in minimum fibrous cap thickness (+44.6 ± 36.0 vs +24.9 ± 38.1 μm, P = 0.007) and a more pronounced decrease in lipid arc (-57.8 ± 52.8 vs -27.0 ± 59.2°, P = 0.005) at follow-up, compared with those who did not achieve the ApoB goal. At follow-up, thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was less prevalent among patients achieving the ApoB goal compared with those not at goal (9.0 vs. 40.0 %, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that achieving an ApoB <65 mg/dL at follow-up independently associated with the absence of TCFA at follow-up (P = 0.004). Lower achieved ApoB levels associated with evidence of greater plaque stabilization even after controlling for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. This highlights the importance of optimizing ApoB levels for the reduction of cardiovascular risk. NCT03570697. Show less

To evaluate whether integrating Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) into the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) cardiovascular risk prediction framework improves its predictive accuracy and clinical applicability within the UK Biobank population. A 10-year prospective cohort study was conducted with 448 303 UK Biobank participants eligible for SCORE2 calculation. Three approaches were employed: (i) threshold analysis to determine the optimal ApoB cutoff for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction using Youden's Index, (ii) assessment of the synergistic effect of SCORE2 and ApoB through concordant and discordant classifications, and (iii) recalibration of the SCORE2 model by incorporating ApoB as an additional predictor. Each 0.2 g/L increase in ApoB was associated with an increased subdistribution hazard for CVD events [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR): 1.13; 95% CI: 1.11-1.14, P < 0.001], accounting for non-cardiovascular death as a competing risk. Threshold analysis identified an optimal ApoB cutoff at 1.18 g/L; however, it demonstrated limited discriminatory performance (area under the curve 0.54), with low sensitivity (32.4%), and moderate specificity (74.4%). Individuals with both low ApoB (<1.18 g/L) and low SCORE2 risk (<5%) had a lower CVD incidence rate (232.51 per 100 000 person-years) compared with those identified as low risk by SCORE2 alone (253.69 per 100 000 person-years). Integration of ApoB into the SCORE2 model did not significantly improve the model discrimination, calibration, and net reclassification improvement. Apolipoprotein B exhibited a dose-response relationship with cardiovascular risk but had limited standalone predictive utility within the UK Biobank population. However, combining ApoB with SCORE2 thresholds improved the identification of low-risk individuals, suggesting a complementary role for ApoB in refining cardiovascular risk stratification. Show less

Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain. To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability. Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023. Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage. Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246. Show less

Apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3) regulates triglyceride metabolism and is associated with accelerated atherogenesis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, its role in peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear. We investigated whether Apoc3 deficiency impacts key features of PAD. Vascularization was assessed using an inflammatory periarterial cuff model (21 days) and a hind limb ischemia model (14 days) in male and female Apoc3 Show less

Indigenous Australians have an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and premature cardiovascular disease. Subpopulations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but HDL composition, size, or function have not been studied in Indigenous Australians. The study consisted of 86 non-Indigenous participants, 43 of whom had T2DM, and 75 Indigenous participants, 36 of whom had T2DM. HDL lipid and apolipoprotein content were determined using enzymatic assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, respectively, and HDL size and distribution were investigated using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Transporter-independent, ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABC)A1- and ABCG1-specific cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) were determined using cell lines stably expressing human ABCA1 or ABCG1. Indigenous participants had significantly lower concentrations of large (10.3-12.0 nm), small (7.4-7.8 nm), and total HDL particles, which persisted after adjustment for serum triglyceride (TG), body mass index (BMI), and T2DM. HDL from Indigenous Australians was also highly enriched in TG, apolipoprotein (apo) E, and apoCIII (all P < .001). Transporter-independent and ABCG1-mediated CEC were not different between the populations. ABCA1-specific CEC per HDL particle was higher in Indigenous than in non-Indigenous subjects (P < .001), and persisted after adjustment for TG, BMI, and T2DM. Multivariable analysis identified that ABCA1-specific CEC was independently and positively associated with HDL-apoCIII and HDL-apoE levels. Indigenous Australians demonstrate significant compositional, size, and functional changes in circulating HDL, which is only partially explained by BMI, hypertriglyceridemia, or T2DM. Remodeled HDL may serve as a biomarker of increased cardiovascular risk in Indigenous Australians. Show less

Obicetrapib is a potent, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Additive reductions in LDL-C occur when obicetrapib is combined with ezetimibe. The impact of obicetrapib and ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) on coronary plaque burden is unknown. Favorable changes in noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume (NCPV) may indicate a potential beneficial effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. REMBRANDT is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial designed to assess the efficacy of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on coronary plaque burden. Individuals aged 45 years or older with ASCVD (imaging evidence of vascular disease or clinically manifested ASCVD) and an LDL-C of ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapy are eligible to participate. Eligible participants (N = 300) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to obicetrapib 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg FDC once daily or placebo tablet once daily. The primary efficacy outcome of REMBRANDT is percent change in total NCPV from baseline to 18 months as assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Secondary endpoints include absolute change in total NCPV, percent and absolute change in NCPV in the most diseased coronary segment, percent change in LDL-C, and change in perivascular fat attenuation index from baseline to 18 months. The REMBRANDT trial will determine whether the favorable effects of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on LDL-C translate to a reduction in coronary plaque burden as a potential mechanism for ASCVD risk reduction. NCT06305559. Show less

Reducing LDL cholesterol prevents atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the LDL cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of obicetrapib, a CETP inhibitor, and ezetimibe. This randomised, double-blind trial across 48 US sites including hospitals, private and group practices, and independent research centres included participants at least 18 years old with pre-existing or high risk for ASVCD or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia with LDL cholesterol concentrations of 1·8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or greater despite maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy excluding ezetimibe, or having statin intolerance. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to obicetrapib 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg FDC, obicetrapib 10 mg monotherapy, ezetimibe 10 mg monotherapy, or placebo administered daily for 84 days. The co-primary endpoints in the intention-to-treat population were the percent LDL cholesterol changes in the FDC group compared with placebo, ezetimibe monotherapy, and obicetrapib monotherapy, and the placebo-adjusted change in the obicetrapib monotherapy group. The trial was prospectively registered (NCT06005597) and is completed. Between March 4 and July 3, 2024, 407 participants were randomly assigned. The median age was 68·0 years (IQR 62·0-73·0) and 177 (43%) were female. Mean baseline LDL cholesterol was 2·4 mmol/L, 2·5 mmol/L, 2·6 mmol/L, and 2·5 mmol/L in the placebo (n=102), ezetimibe monotherapy (n=101), obicetrapib monotherapy (n=102), and FDC groups (n=102), respectively. At day 84, percent differences in LDL cholesterol reduction with the FDC were -48·6% (95% CI -58·3 to -38·9) versus placebo, -27·9% (-37·5 to -18·4) versus ezetimibe, and -16·8% (-26·4 to -7·1) versus obicetrapib. Obicetrapib monotherapy decreased LDL cholesterol by 31·9% (22·1 to 41·6) versus placebo. Adverse event rates were similar in the FDC (52 [51%] of 102), obicetrapib (55 [54%] of 102), and ezetimibe (54 [53%] of 101) groups and lowest with placebo (38 [37%] of 102). Serious adverse event rates were generally similar across FDC (three [3%] of 102), obicetrapib (six [6%] of 102), ezetimibe (seven [7%] of 101), and placebo (four [4%] of 102) groups. Deaths occurred in one [1%] of 102 participants with FDC, one [1%] of 102 with obicetrapib, one [1%] of 101 with ezetimibe, and none with placebo. Combination therapy of obicetrapib and ezetimibe significantly reduced LDL cholesterol. This oral, single-pill therapy could improve LDL cholesterol management in patients with pre-existing or high risk for ASCVD. NewAmsterdam Pharma. Show less

Cost-effectiveness of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] testing is not established. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Lp(a) testing in the cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention population from healthcare and societal perspectives. We constructed and validated a multi-state microsimulation Markov model for a population of 10,000 individuals aged between 40 and 69 years without CVD, selected randomly from the UK Biobank. The model evaluated Lp(a) testing in individuals not initially classified as high-risk based on age, diabetes status, or the SCORE-2 algorithm. Those with an Lp(a) level ≥105 nmol/L (50 mg/dL) were treated as high risk (initiation of a statin plus blood pressure lowering). The Lp(a) testing intervention was compared to standard of care. The primary analyses were conducted from the Australian and UK healthcare perspectives in 2023AUD/GBP. A cost adaptation method estimated cost-effectiveness in multiple European countries, Canada, and the USA. Among 10,000 individuals, 1,807 had their treatment modified from Lp(a) testing. This led to 217 and 255 quality-adjusted life years gained in Australia and the UK, respectively, with corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 12,134 (cost-effective) and -3,491 (cost-saving). From a societal perspective, Lp(a) testing saved $85 and £263 per person in Australia and the UK, respectively. Lp(a) testing was cost-saving among all countries tested in the cost adaptation analysis. Lp(a) testing in the primary prevention population to reclassify CVD risk and treatment is cost-saving and warranted to prevent CVD. Show less

To review the development of oral agents to lower Lp(a) levels as an approach to reducing cardiovascular risk, with a focus on recent advances in the field. Extensive evidence implicates Lp(a) in the causal pathway of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic stenosis. There are currently no therapies approved for lowering of Lp(a). The majority of recent therapeutic advances have focused on development of injectable agents that target RNA and inhibit synthesis of apo(a). Muvalaplin is the first, orally administered, small molecule inhibitor of Lp(a), which acts by disrupting binding of apo(a) and apoB, in clinical development. Nonhuman primate and early human studies have demonstrated the ability of muvalaplin to produce dose-dependent lowering of Lp(a). Ongoing clinical trials will evaluate the impact of muvalaplin in high cardiovascular risk and will ultimately need to determine whether this strategy lowers the rate of cardiovascular events. Muvalaplin is the first oral agent, developed to lower Lp(a) levels. The ability of muvalaplin to reduce cardiovascular risk remains to be investigated, in order to determine whether it will be a useful agent for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Show less

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in lipid metabolism. Early interest in the development of CETP inhibitors proved to be disappointing. Recent interest has focused on the potential for CETP inhibition to reduce cardiovascular risk by lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The data suggesting that low CETP activity may associate with lower levels of cardiovascular risk and early experience with CETP inhibitors focused on raising HDL-C levels. More recent data that suggests that any potential to reduce cardiovascular risk by inhibition of CETP is more likely to result from lowering levels of atherogenic lipid parameters. The development of obicetrapib, a potent CETP inhibitor, with robust lowering of apoB and LDL-C, will be summarized as a potential approach to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Obicetrapib is a potent CETP inhibitor, with a demonstrated ability to lower levels of apoB and LDL-C as monotherapy and in addition to high intensity statin therapy. The ultimate impact of obicetrapib on cardiovascular events will be evaluated by ongoing clinical trials. Show less

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) confers increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and acute pancreatitis. Despite available treatments, persistent ASCVD and acute pancreatitis-associated morbidity from sHTG remains. To determine the tolerability, efficacy, and dose of plozasiran, an APOC3-targeted small interfering-RNA (siRNA) drug, for lowering triglyceride and apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3, regulator of triglyceride metabolism) levels and evaluate its effects on other lipid parameters in patients with sHTG. The Study to Evaluate ARO-APOC3 in Adults With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia (SHASTA-2) was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2b randomized clinical trial enrolling adults with sHTG at 74 centers across the US, Europe, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada from May 31, 2021, to August 31, 2023. Eligible patients had fasting triglyceride levels in the range of 500 to 4000 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0113) while receiving stable lipid-lowering treatment. Participants received 2 subcutaneous doses of plozasiran (10, 25, or 50 mg) or matched placebo on day 1 and at week 12 and were followed up through week 48. The primary end point evaluated the placebo-subtracted difference in means of percentage triglyceride change at week 24. Mixed-model repeated measures were used for statistical modeling. Of 229 patients, 226 (mean [SD] age, 55 [11] years; 176 male [78%]) were included in the primary analysis. Baseline mean (SD) triglyceride level was 897 (625) mg/dL and plasma APOC3 level was 32 (16) mg/dL. Plozasiran induced significant dose-dependent placebo-adjusted least squares (LS)-mean reductions in triglyceride levels (primary end point) of -57% (95% CI, -71.9% to -42.1%; P < .001), driven by placebo-adjusted reductions in APOC3 of -77% (95% CI, -89.1% to -65.8%; P < .001) at week 24 with the highest dose. Among plozasiran-treated patients, 144 of 159 (90.6%) achieved a triglyceride level of less than 500 mg/dL. Plozasiran was associated with dose-dependent increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, which was significant in patients receiving the highest dose (placebo-adjusted LS-mean increase 60% (95% CI, 31%-89%; P < .001). However, apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels did not increase, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels decreased significantly at all doses, with a placebo-adjusted change of -20% at the highest dose. There were also significant durable reductions in remnant cholesterol and ApoB48 as well as increases in HDL-C level through week 48. Adverse event rates were similar in plozasiran-treated patients vs placebo. Serious adverse events were mild to moderate, not considered treatment related, and none led to discontinuation or death. In this randomized clinical trial of patients with sHTG, plozasiran decreased triglyceride levels, which fell below the 500 mg/dL threshold of acute pancreatitis risk in most participants. Other triglyceride-related lipoprotein parameters improved. An increase in LDL-C level was observed but with no change in ApoB level and a decrease in non-HDL-C level. The safety profile was generally favorable at all doses. Additional studies will be required to determine whether plozasiran favorably modulates the risk of sHTG-associated complications. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04720534. Show less

Anacetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor previously under development, exhibited an usually extended terminal half-life and large food effect and accumulated in adipose tissue. Other CETP inhibitors have not shown such effects. Obicetrapib, a potent selective CETP inhibitor, is undergoing Phase III clinical development. Dedicated assessments were conducted in pre-clinical and Phase I and II clinical studies of obicetrapib to examine the pharmacokinetic issues observed with anacetrapib. After 9 months of dosing up to 50 mg/kg/day in cynomolgus monkeys, obicetrapib was completely eliminated from systemic circulation and not detected in adipose tissue after a 13-week recovery period. In healthy humans receiving 1-25 mg of obicetrapib, the mean terminal half-life of obicetrapib was 148, 131, and 121 h at 5, 10, and 25 mg, respectively, and food increased plasma levels by ~1.6-fold with a 10 mg dose. At the end of treatment in Phase II trials, mean plasma levels of obicetrapib ranged from 194.5 ng/mL with 2.5 mg to 506.3 ng/mL with 10 mg. Plasma levels of obicetrapib decreased by 92.2% and 98.5% at four and 15 weeks post-treatment, respectively. Obicetrapib shows no clinically relevant accumulation, is minimally affected by food, and has a mean terminal half-life of 131 h for the 10 mg dose. These data support once daily, chronic dosing of obicetrapib in Phase III trials for dyslipidemia management. Show less

Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events. BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024. These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated. Show less

Activation of thermogenic brown adipose tissue (BAT) and inducible beige adipose tissue (BeAT) is triggered by environmental or metabolic stimuli, including cold ambient temperatures and nutrient stress. Thioesterase superfamily member 1 (Them1), a long-chain fatty acyl-CoA thioesterase that is enriched in BAT, suppresses acute cold-induced thermogenesis. Here, we demonstrate that Show less

Background The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) increases sharply with age. Some older individuals, however, remain unaffected despite high predicted risk. These individuals may carry cardioprotective genetic variants that contribute to resilience. Our aim was to assess whether asymptomatic older individuals without prevalent ASCVD carry cardioprotective genetic variants that contribute to ASCVD resilience. Methods and Results We performed a genome-wide association study using a 10-year predicted ASCVD risk score as a quantitative trait, calculated only in asymptomatic older individuals aged ≥70 years without prevalent ASCVD. Our discovery genome-wide association study of N=12 031 ASCVD event-free individuals from the ASPREE (Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) trial identified 2 independent variants, rs9939224 ( Show less

Obicetrapib, a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein particles, and apolipoproteins, when added to high-intensity statin in patients with dyslipidemia. To evaluate the safety and lipid-altering efficacy of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe combination therapy as an adjunct to high-intensity statin therapy. This double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial administered 10 mg obicetrapib plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 40), 10 mg obicetrapib (n = 39), or placebo (n = 40) for 12 weeks to patients with LDL-C >70 mg/dL and triglycerides (TG) <400 mg/dL, on stable high-intensity statin. Endpoints included concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein particles, and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9), safety, and tolerability. Ninety-seven patients were included in the primary analysis (mean age 62.6 years, 63.9% male, 84.5% white, average body mass index of 30.9 kg/m The combination of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe significantly lowered atherogenic lipid and lipoprotein parameters, and was safe and well tolerated when administered on top of high-intensity statin to patients with elevated LDL-C. Show less

Plasma total HDL (high-density lipoprotein) is a heterogeneous mix of many protein-based subspecies whose functions and associations with coronary heart disease vary. We hypothesize that increasing HDL by CETP (cholesteryl ester transfer protein) inhibition failed to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, in part, because it increased dysfunctional subspecies associated with higher risk such as HDL that contains apoC3. Approach and Results: We studied participants in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of a CETP inhibitor on a background of atorvastatin treatment: ACCENTUATE (The Addition of Evacetrapib to Atorvastatin Compared to Placebo, High Intensity Atorvastatin, and Atorvastatin With Ezetimibe to Evaluate LDL-C Lowering in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia; 130 mg evacetrapib; n=126) and ILLUMINATE (Phase 3 Multi Center, Double Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Evaluation of the Fixed Combination Torcetrapib/Atorvastatin, Administered Orally, Once Daily [Qd], Compared With Atorvastatin Alone, on the Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Events in Subjects With Coronary Heart Disease or Risk Equivalents; 60 mg torcetrapib; n=80). We measured the concentration of apoA1 in total plasma and 17 protein-based HDL subspecies at baseline and 3 months. Both CETP inhibitors increased apoA1 in HDL that contains apoC3 the most of all HDL subspecies (median placebo-adjusted percent increase: evacetrapib 99% and torcetrapib 50%). They also increased apoA1 in other HDL subspecies associated with higher coronary heart disease risk such as those involved in inflammation (α-2-macroglobulin and complement C3) or hemostasis (plasminogen), and in HDL that contains both apoE and apoC3, a complex subspecies associated with higher coronary heart disease risk. ApoA1 in HDL that contains apoC1, associated with lower risk, increased 71% and 40%, respectively. Only HDL that contains apoL1 showed no response to either drug. CETP inhibitors evacetrapib and torcetrapib increase apoA1 in HDL subspecies that contain apoC3 and other HDL subspecies associated with higher risk of coronary heart disease. Subspecies-specific effects shift HDL subspecies concentrations toward a profile associated with higher risk, which may contribute to lack of clinical benefit from raising HDL by pharmaceutical CETP inhibition. Show less

For more than 20 years there has been considerable interest in the development of pharmacological inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) by virtue of their ability to raise levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This review endeavors to integrate existing data from prior clinical trials with emerging data to understand whether there is a pathway forward to develop CETP inhibitors to prevent cardiovascular disease. Large clinical trials have proved disappointing with successive reports of a failure to reduce cardiovascular events. The one clinical development program that did demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular risk found adipose tissue accumulation and did not proceed for regulatory approval. More recent observations suggest that less CETP activity may prevent cardiovascular events, but due to lipid lowering rather than raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In addition, treatment with CETP inhibitors appears to have a beneficial impact on glycemic control in the setting of diabetes. Advances in the field of CETP inhibition suggest a potentially protective effect on the risk of both cardiovascular disease and diabetes. This has implications for how to best design future clinical development programs and leaves the door open to potentially bring CETP inhibitors to the preventive cardiology clinic. Show less

To review recent developments in the field of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition from clinical trials and genomic analyses which have the potential to impact future clinical programs. CETP plays an important role in remodelling of lipoproteins. A large body of evidence suggests that the presence of low CETP activity should have favourable effects on lipid profiles and cardiovascular risk. However, a number of clinical development programs of pharmacological CETP inhibitors have been disappointing with reports of toxicity and clinical futility. These findings have led many to consider abandoning CETP inhibition as a potential strategy for cardiovascular prevention. However, recent observations from genomic analyses and post hoc observations of prior clinical trials have given greater insights into the potential relationship between CETP inhibition and cardiovascular risk. This has highlighted the importance of lowering levels of atherogenic lipoproteins. These findings provide a pathway for ongoing clinical development of CETP inhibitors, where the potential to play an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease may still be possible. The lessons learned and pathway forward for new CETP inhibitors will be reviewed. Show less

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) facilitates the exchange of cholesteryl esters and triglycerides (TG) between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles and TG-rich, apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing particles. Initially, these compounds were developed to raise plasma HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, a mechanism that was previously thought to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). More recently, the focus changed and the use of pharmacologic CETP inhibitors to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL-C and apoB concentrations became supported by several lines of evidence from animal models, observational investigations, randomized controlled trials and Mendelian randomization studies. Furthermore, a cardiovascular outcome trial of anacetrapib demonstrated that CETP inhibition significantly reduced the risk of major coronary events in patients with ASCVD in a manner directly proportional to the substantial reduction in LDL-C and apoB. These data have dramatically shifted the attention on CETP away from raising HDL-C instead to lowering apoB-containing lipoproteins, which is relevant since the newest CETP inhibitor, obicetrapib, reduces LDL-C by up to 51% and apoB by up to 30% when taken in combination with a high-intensity statin. An ongoing cardiovascular outcome trial of obicetrapib in patients with ASCVD is expected to provide further evidence of the ability of CETP inhibitors to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events by lowering apoB. The purpose of the present review is to provide an up-to-date understanding of CETP inhibition and its relationship to ASCVD risk reduction. Show less

Global guidelines for the management of high-cardiovascular-risk patients include aggressive goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Statin therapy alone is often insufficient to reach goals and nonstatin options have limitations. Here, we tested the lipid-lowering effects of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor drug obicetrapib in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in dyslipidaemic patients (n = 120, median LDL-C 88 mg dl Show less

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib results in a marked increase in HDL and reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. We evaluated the impact of treatment with evacetrapib versus placebo in the subset of 8236 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes trial. Time to first occurrence of any component of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina was compared among patients with DM randomized to treatment with evacetrapib (n=4127) or placebo (n=4109) over a median of 26 months of follow-up. The mean baseline LDL at initiation was 80 mg/dL with a mean baseline HDL of 44 mg/dL. In patients with DM, evacetrapib resulted in a 131% mean increase in HDL levels and a 32% mean decrease in LDL at 3 months that was sustained during the course of the trial. At 6 months, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were lower with evacetrapib than placebo (7.08% vs 7.15%, p=0.023). Composite event rates were higher in patients with DM than without DM (Kaplan-Meier estimates: 15.2% vs 10.6%, HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.64, p<0.001). In the DM group, event rates for the composite endpoint (14.5% evacetrapib vs 16% placebo, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07, p=0.38) and individual components of the composite were similar for both evacetrapib and placebo groups. No significant treatment interaction between treatment assignment and diabetes status was noted. Despite a favorable increase in HDL, and decreases in LDL and HbA1c levels in patients with DM, we observed no benefits of treatment with evacetrapib on prespecified clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. Show less

Incident type 2 diabetes is common among patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and is associated with an adverse prognosis. Some data suggest that cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors reduce incident type 2 diabetes. We compared the effect of treatment with the CETP inhibitor dalcetrapib or placebo on incident diabetes in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome. In the dal-OUTCOMES trial, 15,871 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with dalcetrapib 600 mg daily or placebo, beginning 4-12 weeks after an acute coronary syndrome. Absence of diabetes at baseline was based on medical history, no use of antihyperglycemic medication, and hemoglobin A At baseline, 10,645 patients (67% of the trial cohort) did not have diabetes. During a median follow-up of 30 months, incident diabetes was identified in 403 of 5,326 patients (7.6%) assigned to dalcetrapib and in 516 of 5,319 (9.7%) assigned to placebo, corresponding to absolute risk reduction of 2.1%, hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.88; In patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome, incident diabetes is common and is reduced substantially by treatment with dalcetrapib. Show less