👤 Elias Paolo Casula

Inhibition of angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic effects of ANGPTL3 inhibitors. Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing ANGPTL3 inhibitors against placebo. Outcomes included triglycerides (TG), LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), remnant cholesterol (RC), ANGPTL3 and C-reactive protein (CRP). Pooled estimates of percentage change from baseline were obtained using fixed- and random-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mechanism of action: monoclonal antibodies (mAbs, evinacumab), antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs, vupanorsen), and small interfering RNAs (siRNA, zodasiran and solbinsiran). Nine RCTs (1,254 participants) were included. ANGPTL3 inhibition significantly reduced TG (-47.1%), LDL-C (-21.6%), ApoB (-19.9%), non-HDL-C (-31.5%), TC (-32.8%), VLDL-C (-40.6%), and RC (-72.7%). Modest but consistent reductions were also observed in Lp(a) (-11.5%), ApoA1 (-18.3%), and ApoE (-16.4%). ANGPTL3 inhibitors markedly reduced circulating ANGPTL3 protein (-70.7%), with no significant effect on high-sensitivity CRP. Subgroup analyses demonstrated greater reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, non-HDL-C, and TC with evinacumab compared to the other groups, whereas small interfering RNAs produced more pronounced VLDL-C lowering compared with vupanorsen. ANGPTL3 inhibition offers broad lipid-lowering benefits, with particularly marked reductions in TG-rich lipoproteins. Show less

To date, despite the new lipid-lowering drugs, some subjects do not reach LDL-cholesterol and/or lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] goals and lipoprotein apheresis (LA) plays a role in atherosclerosis prevention. The aim of this study is to paint a portrait of the current LA activity in Italy, collecting data via an electronic survey. Forty-seven centers were contacted, data from 142 patients (male 67%) were obtained from 15 sites. Two sites had discontinued LA treatment. In the active sites, a median of 17 [14-26] LA treatment/patient per year was performed; 7/13 sites used more than one LA system, with venous vascular access used in 87% of cases. High Lp(a) plasma concentrations (> 60 mg/dL or ≥ 145 nmol/L) were recorded in 73/142 patients; 14/36 homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients were on lomitapide or evinacumab therapy. The PORTRAIT survey would like to promote a network to better manage the patients on chronic LA. Show less

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques-including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta-burst stimulation (TBS), paired associative stimulation (PAS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-have emerged as valuable tools for modulating neural activity and promoting plasticity. Traditionally, their effects have been interpreted within a binary framework of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity, largely inferred from changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs). However, existing models do not fully capture the complexity of the biological processes engaged by these techniques and despite extensive clinical application, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying NIBS remain only partially understood. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes evidence from in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo studies to delineate how NIBS influences neurotransmission through intracellular signaling, gene expression, and protein synthesis at the cellular level. Emphasis is placed on the roles of classical synaptic models, grounded in Ca Show less

We aimed to compare the molecular and clinical characteristics of patients identified in Italy as affected by either familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) or multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) and to assess the overall benefit of novel triglyceride-lowering therapies prescribed to these patients within the routine clinical care. From the national LIPIGEN-sHTG (Lipid Transport Disorders Italian Genetic Network-Severe Hypertriglyceridemia) registry, 169 patients (57 FCS, 51 MCS, 61 variant-negative, variant-negative MCS) were retrospectively analyzed. Data on clinical and genetic characteristics, medical history, and medications were collected. Peak triglyceride levels were used to define untreated lipid phenotypes. In FCS, 72% exhibited biallelic As compared with MCS, patients with FCS showed a more severe phenotype and higher prevalence of Show less

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In this study we aimed at assessing the effect of currently available lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) on Lp(a) plasma levels. A meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched up to May 2025. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults (≥18 years), phase II, III or IV; (2) English language; (3) comparing the effect of lipid-lowering drugs vs placebo (addition of the same drug to both intervention and control group was acceptable); (4) reporting the effects on Lp(a) levels; (5) intervention duration of more than 3 weeks. The between-group (treatment-placebo) Lp(a) absolute mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each drug class separately. A total of 145,314 subjects from 147 RCTs were included. Statins, bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, omega-3 fatty acids, and fibrates did not affect Lp(a) concentration. Lp(a) levels were significantly reduced by PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAbs, -6.37 mg/dL [-7.26 to -5.47], a 29% reduction from baseline), inclisiran (-4.76 mg/dL [-5.83 to -3.69], a 22% reduction from baseline), CETP inhibitors (CETPi, -6.77 mg/dL [-8.67 to -4.88], a 46% reduction from baseline), and niacin (-7.06 mg/dL [-9.27 to -4.85], a 37% reduction from baseline). In the subgroup analysis by baseline Lp(a) levels, a larger absolute reduction of Lp(a) levels was observed with increasing baseline levels of Lp(a) for PCSK9mAbs, inclisiran, and CETPi. Among available LLTs, PCSK9mAbs, inclisiran, CETPi, and niacin significantly decreased Lp(a) levels. Further research is necessary to understand whether this effect would translate into a clinically relevant cardiovascular benefit. Show less